“Russia launches effort to design new spaceship”, MSNBC.com, 7/4. The Russian Federal Space Agency, Roskosmos, announced their choice for the Advanced Crew Transport System (ACTS/ППСТ) that is to replace the Soyuz: a design by RSC Energiya. It includes an Advanced Crew Vehicle which is to be named Rus’, «Русь». The design is to be done by June 2010; a cargo flight is to take place in 2015, and the first manned flight in 2018. Not surprisingly, the reaction to the announcement is one of cynicism (see this NASA Watch entry) as there is a big gulf between pretty computer images and bringing it into reality:
Every few years, the Russian space agency comes up with yet another plan for a Soyuz replacement. Sometimes this even includes a new launch vehicle proposal. Yet Soyuz is still flying and it flies on the same launch vehicle. I agree with Anon E. Mouse. “Show me the money!”
Some information can be found at: Russian Space Web; “UPDATE: ROSCOSMOS: ACTS’ design work until late 2010” at the Hyperbola blog; NASASpaceflight.com thread; Orbiter-Forum thread.
“Russian rocket plans may prompt new space race”, James Oberg, New Scientist, 7/4.
“Happy US-Russian crew deny ‘divorce in space’ ”, Space Daily, 10/4. NASA astronaut Michael Fincke denied the reports of tensions over supplies on the ISS. Also noted were some remarks from President Medvedev:
Meanwhile, Russian President Dmitrii Medvedev pledged that despite the financial crisis Russia will not cut funds to its space programme. “We will in any case earmark funds for the space sector,” Medvedev told journalists at a award ceremony for two Russian cosmonauts. “If we now – even temporarily – slow development, we will fall 10 years behind…I hope that our cosmonauts will always be at the forefront of the world,” the Russian president said.
“Interview of Anatolii Perminov, Head of the Russian Federal Space Agency, to the Vesti TV-Channel”, Roskosmos, 11/4. Provides an overview of the space program at the moment.
“Russia to Delay Martian Moon Mission”, IEEE Spectrum, 7/4. The Phobos-Grunt Mars probe has, disappointingly, been delayed from 2009 to 2011.
Critics have long called the Phobos-Grunt an overly ambitious enterprise that is beyond the current experience of a Russian space industry battered by a decade of economic crisis, dwindling staff, inadequate funding, and poor management. “All this is going to end up in a scandal,” says Roald Sagdeev, a physics professor at the University of Maryland and former director of the Space Research Institute (IKI), in Moscow, which oversees the science program of the Phobos-Grunt mission. “This project became so politically loaded that people involved will probably be reluctant to admit the true state of affairs until the very last minute,” he says.
